<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Reason Why McCain Will Lose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalcartel.org/2008/08/27/the-reason-why-mccain-will-lose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/08/27/the-reason-why-mccain-will-lose/</link>
	<description>An International Online Editorial Magazine ■ Pittsburgh, PA, USA ■ Seoul, ROK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:21:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David M. Manes</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/08/27/the-reason-why-mccain-will-lose/#comment-4275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David M. Manes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-4275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haha, I was just trying to read through the blog and find where you had said that, Steve.  I&#039;m glad &lt;i&gt;I&#039;m&lt;/i&gt; not the one going crazy, there...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, I was just trying to read through the blog and find where you had said that, Steve.  I&#8217;m glad <i>I&#8217;m</i> not the one going crazy, there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.C. Denney</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/08/27/the-reason-why-mccain-will-lose/#comment-4274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S.C. Denney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-4274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where did I say that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did I say that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen L</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/08/27/the-reason-why-mccain-will-lose/#comment-4212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-4212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s a difference between inclusion and exploitation. Where am I confused about the difference between a typical family and the family of presidential candidates? Does running for president exclude one from being a responsible parent? There is a difference between bringing them out at the end of a speech and involving them as an element in the political machine, using them to craft your persona. If you contrast Obama&#039;s behavior with the recent presidential campaigns of Bush (2) and Clinton, they never so flagrantly used their daughters to gain esteem from voters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a difference between inclusion and exploitation. Where am I confused about the difference between a typical family and the family of presidential candidates? Does running for president exclude one from being a responsible parent? There is a difference between bringing them out at the end of a speech and involving them as an element in the political machine, using them to craft your persona. If you contrast Obama&#8217;s behavior with the recent presidential campaigns of Bush (2) and Clinton, they never so flagrantly used their daughters to gain esteem from voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.C. Denney</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/08/27/the-reason-why-mccain-will-lose/#comment-4208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S.C. Denney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-4208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Political pawns... showcased... exploitation?&quot;  Isn&#039;t the inclusion of small children and close relatives relatively standard procedure for any politician wanting to win?  Don&#039;t confuse typical family life with that of a presidential candidates (from any party, in any election).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Political pawns&#8230; showcased&#8230; exploitation?&#8221;  Isn&#8217;t the inclusion of small children and close relatives relatively standard procedure for any politician wanting to win?  Don&#8217;t confuse typical family life with that of a presidential candidates (from any party, in any election).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen L</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/08/27/the-reason-why-mccain-will-lose/#comment-4203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-4203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think I&#039;m superior to anyone nor did I call Obama evil. I disagree with the practice of using the young children of candidates as political pawns. I have frequently seen his children showcased at events. On Monday night, one MSNBC commentator admitted that every time Obama&#039;s daughters are on stage he gets votes. I don&#039;t think that both candidates will do ANYTHING to get elected. Yes, policies are important, but so is the character of a candidate. As a mother, I would not put my children in that position. I realize that is my personal opinion, but I feel it is a misjudgment on Obama&#039;s part and borders on exploitation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m superior to anyone nor did I call Obama evil. I disagree with the practice of using the young children of candidates as political pawns. I have frequently seen his children showcased at events. On Monday night, one MSNBC commentator admitted that every time Obama&#8217;s daughters are on stage he gets votes. I don&#8217;t think that both candidates will do ANYTHING to get elected. Yes, policies are important, but so is the character of a candidate. As a mother, I would not put my children in that position. I realize that is my personal opinion, but I feel it is a misjudgment on Obama&#8217;s part and borders on exploitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JH</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/08/27/the-reason-why-mccain-will-lose/#comment-4201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-4201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God is going to send every one who participated in this thread straight to hell, and even then He&#039;ll wonder if he might have gone a little soft on you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God is going to send every one who participated in this thread straight to hell, and even then He&#8217;ll wonder if he might have gone a little soft on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkkuwitzky</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/08/27/the-reason-why-mccain-will-lose/#comment-4197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jkkuwitzky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-4197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually his daughters appearing on stage with him has been a relatively infrequent occurrence during Obama&#039;s candidacy, and at any rate it has been far from every chance he gets. They were certainly front and center Monday night, but that is hardly unusual for a candidate of any kind. I really don&#039;t like the seeming insatiable desire of serious partisans in this election to insist that their opponent somehow suffers from serious character defects. There are certainly aspects of politics that can appear unseemly (and perhaps they are), but why can&#039;t we just admit that both of these guys will do absolutely anything to win and that we should vote for and against them because of how we feel about their policies? I suppose it makes one feel better to convince oneself that you are of fundamentally superior character than the evil man who would be king. 

And please don&#039;t include any reference to far left Obamaphiles who think he is the messiah in any responses. I&#039;m not one, I know they do the same thing,and I don&#039;t like them either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually his daughters appearing on stage with him has been a relatively infrequent occurrence during Obama&#8217;s candidacy, and at any rate it has been far from every chance he gets. They were certainly front and center Monday night, but that is hardly unusual for a candidate of any kind. I really don&#8217;t like the seeming insatiable desire of serious partisans in this election to insist that their opponent somehow suffers from serious character defects. There are certainly aspects of politics that can appear unseemly (and perhaps they are), but why can&#8217;t we just admit that both of these guys will do absolutely anything to win and that we should vote for and against them because of how we feel about their policies? I suppose it makes one feel better to convince oneself that you are of fundamentally superior character than the evil man who would be king. </p>
<p>And please don&#8217;t include any reference to far left Obamaphiles who think he is the messiah in any responses. I&#8217;m not one, I know they do the same thing,and I don&#8217;t like them either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen L</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/08/27/the-reason-why-mccain-will-lose/#comment-4195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-4195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[100 negative ads are better than Obama&#039;s practice of parading his daughters around on stage every chance he gets. If he can&#039;t win on his own merits and policies, he doesn&#039;t deserve to be president. HRC was accused of &quot;pimping&quot; out Chelsea, but what Obama is doing is much worse. His children are underage. They should be concerned about being little girls, and not concerned about getting the &quot;how cute&quot; vote for their father. I realize he&#039;s trying to paint himself as a &quot;family man,&quot; but I don&#039;t know what that has to do with running for president. I recall the Clintons were fiercely protective of Chelsea during his campaign and presidency. McCain rarely speaks of his children. The last time I heard him do so was at that Rick Warren thing when he discussed his policy on adoption and referred to his daughter, but didn&#039;t even call her by name. What Obama is doing is despicable and speaks volumes about his character or lack there of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100 negative ads are better than Obama&#8217;s practice of parading his daughters around on stage every chance he gets. If he can&#8217;t win on his own merits and policies, he doesn&#8217;t deserve to be president. HRC was accused of &#8220;pimping&#8221; out Chelsea, but what Obama is doing is much worse. His children are underage. They should be concerned about being little girls, and not concerned about getting the &#8220;how cute&#8221; vote for their father. I realize he&#8217;s trying to paint himself as a &#8220;family man,&#8221; but I don&#8217;t know what that has to do with running for president. I recall the Clintons were fiercely protective of Chelsea during his campaign and presidency. McCain rarely speaks of his children. The last time I heard him do so was at that Rick Warren thing when he discussed his policy on adoption and referred to his daughter, but didn&#8217;t even call her by name. What Obama is doing is despicable and speaks volumes about his character or lack there of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/08/27/the-reason-why-mccain-will-lose/#comment-4194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-4194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do love Bill Richardson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do love Bill Richardson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YoungConservative08</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/08/27/the-reason-why-mccain-will-lose/#comment-4192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YoungConservative08]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=632#comment-4192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I think “negative” ads are fine if all you mean by “negative” is that a candidate’s campaign is pointing out flaws in their opponent’s politics. It’s the personal stuff that I think is a shame, effective or not.&quot;

Chris Berry, I am so glad that you brought this up because it opens the door for me to ask you this: How is launching an enormous (and I might add seemingly desperate) attack campaign against Sen. McCain on the number of houses he owns any different from Sen. McCain launching an equally enormous attack campaign against Sen. Obama with regard to his close association and mentorship of the Reverand Jeremiah Wright (which I might also add that Sen. McCain vociferously condemned the republican adds doing just this during the primaries in the Carolinas)?

I have enjoyed Sen. McCain&#039;s ads portraying Sen. Obama as nothing but a celebrity because it has brought some humor to an election process that is always constrained by seriousness. Now I am not saying that a campaign should be a joke, because the POTUS is not laughing matter. However, there is nothing wrong with, and I quite enjoy, the little bit of humor combined with the substantive policy attacks.

&quot;It’s interesting that while McCain and his followers are calling for a high level of discourse and a clean campaign, he is running one of the most negative campaigns we have seen. Almost every campaign ad and the vast majority of right-wing blogs, newspapers, and pundits focus completely on attacking Obama to the exclusion of any sort of cohesive alternative.&quot;

You know David, I was thinking the exact same thing about Sen. Obama and him saying that he was going to run a clean campaign with a high level of discourse, and yet he has engaged in one of the most negative campaigns we have seen and denied multiple invitations to encourage this high level of discourse through joint town hall meetings (it seems that, from multiple examples throughout this campaign, that Sen. Obama does not do so well without a teleprompter or prepared speech in front of him and especially not when he is asked tough questions). Also, I find i interesting that you are saying that the vast majority of the &quot;media&quot; and the McCain campaign are attacking Obama without doing anything else when the same thing is happening to Sen. McCain in reverse (although you have to admit that the media loves Obama so much more than they love McCain, and it shows through their biased reporting--CNN, MSNBC, NBC, etc.). Obama is not the only one suffering from a wave of accusations and negative talk within our modern day of mass communication, so please do not play the victim game here. Those complaints fall straight to the floor where they belong. Why doesn&#039;t Sen. Obama agree to more debates with Sen. McCain so that they can discuss the issues, and bring the media coverage back to that. Instead, Sen. Obama runs from those opportunities (only agreeing to the 3 presidential debates) and instead elects to give stump speeches that make people swoon, yet give nothing of substance. I know it is hard to present the whole truth when you completely support a candidate (trust me you are not the only one who suffers from that, on both sides of the aisle), but I do ask that you at least present the truth of both sides in order to appear as a respectable source of knowledge and information (the blog as a whole not just you David, I didn&#039;t mean to single you out or demean you in any way by this).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think “negative” ads are fine if all you mean by “negative” is that a candidate’s campaign is pointing out flaws in their opponent’s politics. It’s the personal stuff that I think is a shame, effective or not.&#8221;</p>
<p>Chris Berry, I am so glad that you brought this up because it opens the door for me to ask you this: How is launching an enormous (and I might add seemingly desperate) attack campaign against Sen. McCain on the number of houses he owns any different from Sen. McCain launching an equally enormous attack campaign against Sen. Obama with regard to his close association and mentorship of the Reverand Jeremiah Wright (which I might also add that Sen. McCain vociferously condemned the republican adds doing just this during the primaries in the Carolinas)?</p>
<p>I have enjoyed Sen. McCain&#8217;s ads portraying Sen. Obama as nothing but a celebrity because it has brought some humor to an election process that is always constrained by seriousness. Now I am not saying that a campaign should be a joke, because the POTUS is not laughing matter. However, there is nothing wrong with, and I quite enjoy, the little bit of humor combined with the substantive policy attacks.</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s interesting that while McCain and his followers are calling for a high level of discourse and a clean campaign, he is running one of the most negative campaigns we have seen. Almost every campaign ad and the vast majority of right-wing blogs, newspapers, and pundits focus completely on attacking Obama to the exclusion of any sort of cohesive alternative.&#8221;</p>
<p>You know David, I was thinking the exact same thing about Sen. Obama and him saying that he was going to run a clean campaign with a high level of discourse, and yet he has engaged in one of the most negative campaigns we have seen and denied multiple invitations to encourage this high level of discourse through joint town hall meetings (it seems that, from multiple examples throughout this campaign, that Sen. Obama does not do so well without a teleprompter or prepared speech in front of him and especially not when he is asked tough questions). Also, I find i interesting that you are saying that the vast majority of the &#8220;media&#8221; and the McCain campaign are attacking Obama without doing anything else when the same thing is happening to Sen. McCain in reverse (although you have to admit that the media loves Obama so much more than they love McCain, and it shows through their biased reporting&#8211;CNN, MSNBC, NBC, etc.). Obama is not the only one suffering from a wave of accusations and negative talk within our modern day of mass communication, so please do not play the victim game here. Those complaints fall straight to the floor where they belong. Why doesn&#8217;t Sen. Obama agree to more debates with Sen. McCain so that they can discuss the issues, and bring the media coverage back to that. Instead, Sen. Obama runs from those opportunities (only agreeing to the 3 presidential debates) and instead elects to give stump speeches that make people swoon, yet give nothing of substance. I know it is hard to present the whole truth when you completely support a candidate (trust me you are not the only one who suffers from that, on both sides of the aisle), but I do ask that you at least present the truth of both sides in order to appear as a respectable source of knowledge and information (the blog as a whole not just you David, I didn&#8217;t mean to single you out or demean you in any way by this).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

