<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Techno-Optimism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalcartel.org/2008/05/06/techno-optimism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/05/06/techno-optimism/</link>
	<description>An International Online Editorial Magazine ■ Pittsburgh, PA, USA ■ Seoul, ROK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 20:12:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David M. Manes</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/05/06/techno-optimism/#comment-3426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David M. Manes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=401#comment-3426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I certainly wouldn&#039;t expect companies to altruistically devote their resources to developing and implementing technology that doesn&#039;t immediately benefit them.  I don&#039;t think they are lazy for doing what is in their nature and looking out for themselves and their own immediate profit.  That is why it is up to our society and our government to influence the market through incentives and laws and taxes to promote alternative energy and clean energy development.  I think that the elements of society at large who resist that kind of regulatory action and put their faith blindly in unknown future technology are very lazy and very irresponsible.  

You are right that there is more focus on alternative energy now than ever before, but it is not nearly enough because it still isn&#039;t comparatively profitable here in the U.S. because of various things including our very low gas taxes.  But with the other issue I mentioned, climate change, there is very little being done by companies.  Again, it is understandable from their perspective, but it is irresponsible for our society to turn a blind eye to this dangerous pattern.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly wouldn&#8217;t expect companies to altruistically devote their resources to developing and implementing technology that doesn&#8217;t immediately benefit them.  I don&#8217;t think they are lazy for doing what is in their nature and looking out for themselves and their own immediate profit.  That is why it is up to our society and our government to influence the market through incentives and laws and taxes to promote alternative energy and clean energy development.  I think that the elements of society at large who resist that kind of regulatory action and put their faith blindly in unknown future technology are very lazy and very irresponsible.  </p>
<p>You are right that there is more focus on alternative energy now than ever before, but it is not nearly enough because it still isn&#8217;t comparatively profitable here in the U.S. because of various things including our very low gas taxes.  But with the other issue I mentioned, climate change, there is very little being done by companies.  Again, it is understandable from their perspective, but it is irresponsible for our society to turn a blind eye to this dangerous pattern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.C. Denney</title>
		<link>http://politicalcartel.org/2008/05/06/techno-optimism/#comment-3421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S.C. Denney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 04:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalcartel.wordpress.com/?p=401#comment-3421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there was enough market incentive to develop innovative technology, it would be done -- as you imply.  However, until that demand arrives, the opportunity cost to the potentially interested business is far too high.  This leads me to believe that most of these techno-optimist aren&#039;t &quot;lazy,&quot; per se, just market conscious. But the classification of a bad techno-optimist is somewhat ambiguous, to me.  It would be hard for an company to commit monetary suicide for the future.

Also, don&#039;t you think there is a considerable amount of technological innovation in the field of alternative fuels?  Enough that companies aren&#039;t spending more than their budget can afford.  Technological advances in Ethanol E85 (especially in the field of cellulosic Ethanol), Hydrogen cells, and biofuels are receiving more time and money than ever before.  The market force and incentive is there, relatively speaking, and time and ingenuity are being invested into research and development for alternative fuel sources.

Not to sound too apocalyptic, but a energy &quot;disaster,&quot; or &quot;crisis&quot; (like an oil embargo or OPEC meltdown) could result in even more public support and political capital for technological advancement in alternative fuels.  Disasters typically do produce the proverbial technological deus ex machina.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there was enough market incentive to develop innovative technology, it would be done &#8212; as you imply.  However, until that demand arrives, the opportunity cost to the potentially interested business is far too high.  This leads me to believe that most of these techno-optimist aren&#8217;t &#8220;lazy,&#8221; per se, just market conscious. But the classification of a bad techno-optimist is somewhat ambiguous, to me.  It would be hard for an company to commit monetary suicide for the future.</p>
<p>Also, don&#8217;t you think there is a considerable amount of technological innovation in the field of alternative fuels?  Enough that companies aren&#8217;t spending more than their budget can afford.  Technological advances in Ethanol E85 (especially in the field of cellulosic Ethanol), Hydrogen cells, and biofuels are receiving more time and money than ever before.  The market force and incentive is there, relatively speaking, and time and ingenuity are being invested into research and development for alternative fuel sources.</p>
<p>Not to sound too apocalyptic, but a energy &#8220;disaster,&#8221; or &#8220;crisis&#8221; (like an oil embargo or OPEC meltdown) could result in even more public support and political capital for technological advancement in alternative fuels.  Disasters typically do produce the proverbial technological deus ex machina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

